Council’s energy network to be expanded

Thousands more Enfield homes to receive heating and hot water from Energetik, reports Simon Allin, Local Democracy Reporter

The Energetik network uses heat from Edmonton incinerator
The Energetik network is a communal heating system for domestic properties

A £49million energy scheme expansion has got the go-ahead despite concerns over rising debt and its links to a controversial incinerator.

The Energetik heat network – an Enfield Council-led scheme set up to provide low-cost, low-carbon heating for residents – will be extended along the east and south of the borough after councillors gave the go-ahead at an extraordinary council meeting on Wednesday.

An extra 4,750 homes and businesses will be connected to the scheme as a result of the expansion, boosting the council’s retained earnings to £90m, according to a council report.

The report states that expanding the network will lead to greater carbon savings, while tackling fuel poverty.

Mary Maguire, cabinet member for finance, told the meeting: “This is a real opportunity to take advantage of cheap loans and grant funds to invest in a company that will drastically improve our environment.”

But opposition councillors refused to back the expansion, which the report reveals will increase the council’s total borrowing on the Energetik scheme to £77m.

This story is published by Enfield Dispatch, Enfield's free monthly newspaper and free news website. We are a not-for-profit publication, published by a small social enterprise. We have no rich backers and rely on the support of our readers. Donate or become a supporter.

Conservative James Hockney, the shadow cabinet member for finance, accused the council of taking a “socialist approach to taxpayers’ money”, pumping more cash into a “loss-making company”.

Cllr Hockney said it would use energy from the new Edmonton incinerator, which he described as “belching out toxic pollution affecting families in the poorest parts of our borough”.

Community First councillor Ayfer Orhan claimed the expansion would “move the council towards potential bankruptcy”.

She said residents in her ward who had signed up to Energetik told her it was not good value for money, their energy bills were too high, and they were “tied into a product they did not vote for, ask for, or want”.

Defending the plans, former council leader Doug Taylor compared the project to the Victorians building the railways, pointing out they had to invest in the infrastructure before they could receive income.

He said that while the incinerator exists, the council should look to socialise the benefits through the heat. “If the incinerator was not there, then we would look for alternative ways of generating heat,” Cllr Taylor added. “To me, this is a great opportunity for the borough.”

After the debate, Labour councillors backed the extra investment and the expansion in the heat network. The Conservatives and Community First voted against.

No news is bad news 

Independent news outlets like ours – reporting for the community without rich backers – are under threat of closure, turning British towns into news deserts. 

The audiences they serve know less, understand less, and can do less. 

In celebration of Indie News Week, Public Interest News Foundation's Indie News Fund will match fund all donations, including new annual supporter subscriptions for the month of June.

If our coverage has helped you understand our community a little bit better, please consider supporting us with a monthly, yearly or one-off donation. 

Choose the news. Don’t lose the news.

Monthly direct debit 

Annual direct debit

£5 per month supporters get a digital copy of each month’s paper before anyone else, £10 per month supporters get a digital copy of each month’s paper before anyone else and a print copy posted to them each month. £50 annual supporters get a digital copy of each month's paper before anyone else.  

Donate now with Pay Pal

More information on supporting us monthly or yearly 

More Information about donations