News

Hall wants to delay London ‘net zero’ plans by 20 years

The Tory candidate wants the capital to take its time tackling climate change, reports Noah Vickers, Local Democracy Reporter

Susan Hall (credit Noah Vickers/LDRS)
Susan Hall (credit Noah Vickers/LDRS)

Tory mayoral candidate Susan Hall suggested on Monday (22nd) she would delay net zero in London by up to two decades, while promising to achieve carbon neutrality “as soon as possible”.

Hall said Labour mayor Sadiq Khan’s pledge to achieve net zero emissions by 2030 was “virtue-signalling” and would “cost a fortune, which he doesn’t have”.

The Conservative candidate refused to commit herself to any deadline, with her newly-published manifesto only saying that she will “provide a realistic path to net zero carbon emissions as soon as possible”.

Asked whether she had dropped Khan’s 2030 pledge, she said: “The mayor’s plan really was virtue-signalling, because he can’t do it without certain things going through parliament.

“It would cost an absolute fortune which he doesn’t have. So it’s yet another case of him promising things that he can’t deliver.

“I’ll be looking to see if we can do it as quickly as possible. But we mustn’t do it at the expense of motorists, because that’s exactly what he’s doing.

“I mean, he talks about Ulez expansion cleaning up the air – his own impact assessment showed him it would make no difference whatsoever.

“So what you will get from me is things that are realistic, things that can be done without charging the poorest a tax, and looking to see how we can all contribute to it, without it absolutely making us all bankrupt, quite frankly.”

Asked whether she would at least try to achieve net zero in the capital before the government’s UK-wide target of 2050, she said: “We’ll have to look at it and see what we can do.

“There are very many different things that you can do, and you can use different bodies and charities to help. But Sadiq Khan just virtue-signals, because he thinks it sounds good.”


This story is published by Enfield Dispatch, Enfield's free monthly newspaper and free news website. We are a not-for-profit publication, published by a small social enterprise. We have no rich backers and rely on the support of our readers. Donate or become a supporter.


Hall told GB News last year that she supports the national 2050 target.

Her claim about the Ulez impact assessment is in relation to an independent report by the firm Jacobs, published about 15 months before the zone expanded to cover all of London.

The report found that the “proposed scheme is modelled to result in a minor reduction (-1.3%) in the average exposure of the population of Greater London to NO2 and negligible reductions (-0.1%) in average exposure to PM2.5”.

City Hall responded to this point last year by saying it was important to understand the impact of the policy “in absolute terms”.

“For example, although NO2 concentration reductions are smaller in percentage terms than for the central London Ulez, in absolute terms there is a much larger volume of NOx emissions saved equating to 362 tonnes. This is in comparison to the 240 tonnes saving we saw in central London,” the mayor’s spokesperson said.

Hall also refused to say when she would seek to get the capital’s bus fleet completely electrified. Khan recently promised to bring forward the electrification of the fleet from 2034 to 2030.

The Tory candidate said: “I don’t want to do anything similar to Sadiq Khan, because he’s been a total disaster quite frankly. We’ll get electric buses as soon as I can afford them, because I think they’re a good idea.”

Explaining why she would not put a deadline on her manifesto pledge to “accelerate the transition to electric buses”, she said that “people are sick to death of politicians promising the world” and that she would only make commitments that she is “100% certain” she can “absolutely deliver”.

Her manifesto promises that she will “direct TfL to prioritise fully electric buses on routes where the air quality is worse”.

Labour have attacked Hall for her social media activity in relation to global warming, including the fact that she in 2022 shared an article from The Daily Sceptic which dismissed the impact of man-made greenhouse gas emissions on climate change.

The Conservatives have rejected the suggestion that Ms Hall is a “climate change denier”, as they say she “believes in a fair and practical transition to net zero”.


No news is bad news 

Independent news outlets like ours – reporting for the community without rich backers – are under threat of closure, turning British towns into news deserts. 

The audiences they serve know less, understand less, and can do less. 

In celebration of Indie News Week, Public Interest News Foundation's Indie News Fund will match fund all donations, including new annual supporter subscriptions for the month of June.

If our coverage has helped you understand our community a little bit better, please consider supporting us with a monthly, yearly or one-off donation. 

Choose the news. Don’t lose the news.

Monthly direct debit 

Annual direct debit

£5 per month supporters get a digital copy of each month’s paper before anyone else, £10 per month supporters get a digital copy of each month’s paper before anyone else and a print copy posted to them each month. £50 annual supporters get a digital copy of each month's paper before anyone else.  

Donate now with Pay Pal

More information on supporting us monthly or yearly 

More Information about donations