Home secretary's move to oust Khan as mayor blocked

Unnamed former cabinet minister wanted Khan gone, reports Joe Talora, Local Democracy Reporter

Labour mayor Sadiq Khan has hit out at Labour-run Enfield Council over its Green Belt plans — *London mayor Sadiq Khan*

A “furious” former home secretary lobbied to have Sadiq Khan impeached from his role as mayor of London following the resignation of Cressida Dick as Met Commissioner earlier this year, it has been revealed.

Khan was once again summonsed to face questions from the London Assembly’s police and crime committee today (Tuesday) alongside Sir Tom Winsor over the circumstances surrounding the former commissioner’s resignation.

It follows a meeting last month which saw the pair clash over the report authored by Sir Tom which found that Khan failed to follow due process and that Cressida Dick felt “intimidated” into stepping down.

Sir Tom, whose report included nine recommendations, told assembly members that a “tenth option” was presented to him by a former home secretary, though he did not clarify which one. Three have served in the role this year, including Priti Patel, Grant Shapps (for six days) and incumbent Suella Braverman in her second stint.

He said: “There is a tenth option. I decided not to include it in my report because I thought it would distract from the rest of the report and I don’t think it is democratically realistic. This option was not one of my devising, it was given to me by a former home secretary who was furious with what happened in the case of Cressida Dick.”

This story is published by Enfield Dispatch, Enfield's free monthly newspaper and free news website. We are a not-for-profit publication, published by a small social enterprise. We have no rich backers and rely on the support of our readers. Donate or become a supporter.

Sir Tom told assembly members that the option recommended that the home secretary should be “empowered” to make an address to the House of Commons if an independent report, such as his, came to “severely, adversely critical” conclusions about a mayor or Police and Crime Commissioner (PCC).

In the event that such an address to the commons is passed, it would mean that “the office of mayor or PCC is, by virtue of that vote, vacated and the vacant office is therein subject to a new election”.

Responding to Sir Tom, Khan said it “beggars belief” that a home secretary would be able to sack an elected mayor.

He said: “The government said, in it’s own words, that […] the introduction of PCCs – I am the PCC – is ‘the most significant democratic reform of policing in our lifetime’. So, parliament must have intended for there to be a gamechanger with the PCCs being developed.

“What the protocol says is the establishment of PCCs has allowed the Home Office to withdraw from day to day policing matters, giving the police freedom to fight crime as they see fit, and allowing local communities to hold the police to account by the elected mayor doing that.”

In his closing remarks, Khan took a final parting shot at Sir Tom, who he once again accused of being “biased” and said his report would “gather dust on shelves and not go anywhere”.

We know times are hard

If you are struggling to make ends meet, we are keeping Enfield Dispatch free because of you. We know that many people cannot afford to pay for local news, so this website and our print paper will always be free. If you can afford to, and value what we do, a small monthly, yearly or one-off contribution can support us to keep providing quality journalism for Enfield to our community for free.

Monthly direct debit

Annual direct debit

£5 per month supporters get a digital copy of each month’s paper before anyone else, £10 per month supporters get a digital copy of each month’s paper before anyone else and a print copy posted to them each month. £50 annual supporters get a digital copy of each month's paper before anyone else.