News

No ‘plan B’ if City Hall loses Ulez legal challenge

Khan quizzed on what happens if Ultra-Low Emission Zone rollout has to be delayed or cancelled, reports Noah Vickers, Local Democracy Reporter

The North Circular, which is the current limit of the Ultra Low Emission Zone (Ulez)
The North Circular in Enfield, which is the current limit of the Ultra Low Emission Zone (Ulez)

City Hall has no financial plan for if it loses a legal challenge over its attempt to expand the Ultra Low Emission Zone (Ulez), Sadiq Khan has confirmed.

The mayor of London revealed that no budgetary preparations had taken place for the eventuality of losing the legal challenge brought against City Hall by the borough councils of Bexley, Bromley, Harrow and Hillingdon, along with Surrey County Council.

The five councils are all opposed to the Ulez expansion and have together filed a lawsuit, which claims that the move would be unlawful.

The question of whether there would be any impact on City Hall’s budget if it lost the legal challenge was raised by the Conservative London Assembly member Nick Rogers at a meeting on Tuesday (22nd).

Nick asked the mayor: “What would be the budgetary consequence of any delay or change to the Ulez plans?”

Khan replied: “I’ve been mayor now for seven years, minus a few weeks, and I’ve experienced many legal challenges to TfL [Transport for London], as did the previous mayor – so there’s always legal challenges when you’re running a public transport body like TfL.

“What you don’t do is work on the basis that you’re going to lose a legal challenge, you work on the basis that the plans that we have will go ahead.

“So there aren’t any plans about the consequences to the budget of those five Conservative councils succeeding in their judicial review.”

Nick, who represents Hounslow, Kingston and Richmond on the London Assembly, followed up: “So you’ve no contingency plans for if the case is lost?”

“If the councils win, no,” replied Khan.

Ulez currently covers the area inside the north and south circular roads, but Khan intends to expand the zone to cover all of London – effectively taking it up to most roads inside the M25 motorway – from 29th August this year. Drivers of non-compliant vehicles within the Ulez have to pay a daily charge of £12.50.


This story is published by Enfield Dispatch, Enfield's free monthly newspaper and free news website. We are a not-for-profit publication, published by a small social enterprise. We have no rich backers and rely on the support of our readers. Donate or become a supporter.


The expansion plan has come up against opposition from councils in outer London and the home counties, who mainly argue that the zone’s expansion will do little to improve air quality – and is being introduced at the worst possible time owing to the cost of living crisis.

Khan claims that five million more Londoners will breathe cleaner air if the Ulez expands to cover the whole city and often points out that around 4,000 premature deaths in London per year are due in part to poor air quality.

In Tuesday’s meeting, Nick also asked whether any timetable changes had been made due to the legal challenge: “Have you taken any action at all; no pausing of rollouts, no pausing of procurement, nothing like that at all?”

Khan said no pausing had taken place.

Finally, Nick asked whether enforcement cameras to monitor the expanded Ulez were going up yet.

Khan’s chief of staff, David Bellamy, replied: “Yes, the process is happening. The rollout has been happening initially on TfL-owned roads, and then we’re working obviously with boroughs and going through the appropriate processes with them for the rollout.”

At the end of January, only 16 out of 24 outer London boroughs had agreed to have cameras erected on their roads. Some of those delays were due to approval being required from a full council meeting rather than there being in-principle objections.

TfL already has the legal power to install about two-thirds of the new required cameras because they will be placed on top of existing traffic lights. TfL also has the authority to erect cameras on borough roads but has said it would prefer to do this with local consent.


No news is bad news 

Independent news outlets like ours – reporting for the community without rich backers – are under threat of closure, turning British towns into news deserts. 

The audiences they serve know less, understand less, and can do less. 

In celebration of Indie News Week, Public Interest News Foundation's Indie News Fund will match fund all donations, including new annual supporter subscriptions for the month of June.

If our coverage has helped you understand our community a little bit better, please consider supporting us with a monthly, yearly or one-off donation. 

Choose the news. Don’t lose the news.

Monthly direct debit 

Annual direct debit

£5 per month supporters get a digital copy of each month’s paper before anyone else, £10 per month supporters get a digital copy of each month’s paper before anyone else and a print copy posted to them each month. £50 annual supporters get a digital copy of each month's paper before anyone else.  

Donate now with Pay Pal

More information on supporting us monthly or yearly 

More Information about donations