News

Council told to pay Enfield family £5,000 after ‘significant injustice’ of year-long hotel stay

An ombudsman report also slammed the council for giving the homeless mother and daughter just one day to consider a move to the north-east of England, reports Grace Howarth, Local Democracy Reporter

Newcastle
The family were given one day to weigh up a move to the north-east

Enfield Council has been instructed to pay a family £5,000 for leaving them to live in a hotel for a year – and then giving them one day to accept a housing offer 250 miles away.

The Local Government and Social Care Ombudsman explained in a report that the mother and her daughter had experienced a “significant injustice” as a result of the council’s handling of their housing situation.

In the report it stated the mother – referred to anonymously as Ms B – approached the council in June 2022 to declare homelessness. The council said it discharged its duty at this time as an initial offer of interim accommodation was refused by the family, but the watchdog deemed this action “wrong”.

Ms B again approached the council in October 2022 and this time was placed with her daughter in emergency bed and breakfast (B&B) accommodation, comprising a room in a hotel with shared facilities.

Government guidance states residents should not be forced to live in this type of accommodation beyond six weeks – but Ms B and her daughter remained there for over a year.

In May 2023 the council accepted it had a main housing duty to the family. The same month Ms B asked for her accommodation to be reviewed, and it was subsequently found to be “unsuitable” for them to continue living in.

The council placed the family on a ‘transfer list’ after which Mrs B was told her review was “resolved” and she had “no further right of appeal”. 

Ms B requested a further review since the statutory time limit to stay in B&B accommodation had expired but the council explained there was a “severe shortage” of temporary accommodation and privately rented properties in the borough.

As a consequence the council said it was looking “further afield” at accommodation “out of the London area” to house the family.

In September 2023, the council offered Ms B a private-rented property in north-east England, 250 miles away, and gave her less than a day to agree. Mrs B refused the property as she would be “isolated” and her daughter’s education “impacted”.

The ombudsman said Ms B had a “right to appeal” the offer and for the council to review its suitability, but instead she was “penalised for refusing an unsuitable offer”. The ombudsman also found the time given to accept the offer “unreasonable”.

The report concluded: “The council has given no reasons as to why Ms B‘s established social and support networks were not essential to her family’s welfare and why Ms B would not be isolated even though the council was asking her to move 250 miles away to a place where she knew nobody. It made no mention of the impact on her daughter’s education or Ms B’s employment.

“I also consider the manner in which the council made the offer to Ms B was unreasonable: it gave her less than 24 hours to consider and digest the prospect of moving 250 miles away. This was fault which exacerbated an already stressful situation.”

In response, a spokesperson said the council accepted the findings of the ombudsman and agreed to the procedural review recommendations that were made in the report. 

They said that an offer of accommodation to Ms B was accepted in December 2023 and added: “We take complaints very seriously and have improved our processes.

“We have moved to a national placement policy as a result of the extreme shortage of accommodation in London and the south-east.

“We have communicated widely with all homeless households in temporary accommodation of our approach to make suitable offers of accommodation that are both affordable and meet the needs of individuals and families.”


No news is bad news 

Independent news outlets like ours – reporting for the community without rich backers – are under threat of closure, turning British towns into news deserts. 

The audiences they serve know less, understand less, and can do less. 

If our coverage has helped you understand our community a little bit better, please consider supporting us with a monthly, yearly or one-off donation. 

Choose the news. Don’t lose the news.

Monthly direct debit 

Annual direct debit

£5 per month supporters get a digital copy of each month’s paper before anyone else, £10 per month supporters get a digital copy of each month’s paper before anyone else and a print copy posted to them each month. £50 annual supporters get a digital copy of each month's paper before anyone else.  

Donate now with Pay Pal

More information on supporting us monthly or yearly 

More Information about donations