‘Loo deserts’ report finds no toilets at nearly half of Piccadilly Line stations

The ‘London Loo League Table’ report warns that less than a quarter of stations in Zones 1-3 have toilets, reports Noah Vickers, Local Democracy Reporter

Caroline Russell AM (inset) is campaigning for more public toilets
Caroline Russell AM (inset) is campaigning for more public toilets

Large sections of London’s tube network have been dubbed “loo deserts” in a new report looking at toilet provisions on the underground.

The ‘London Loo League Table’ report warns that less than a quarter of stations in Zones 1-3 have toilets, and that their availability varies wildly between tube lines.

Authored by Caroline Russell, a Green member of the London Assembly, the research says that while 83% of Metropolitan Line stations have loos, the same is true of just 27% on the Northern Line.

The longest stretch without toilets was found on the Northern Line between Morden and Kennington, with passengers having to wait until the next stop at Elephant & Castle to find facilities.

Another loo desert is found on the District Line between Wimbledon Park and Bayswater – a gap of a ten stops, taking 22 minutes.

Even the most modern stations can lack loos, the report points out – with the Elizabeth Line missing toilets at three stations, including Bond Street and Canary Wharf.

Russell said: “Londoners shouldn’t have to cross their legs and hope on the tube.

“A properly accessible public transport system must include toilets and information on where to find them.

“This is essential for everyone, especially older and disabled people who may be restricted from travelling by a ‘loo leash’.”

She added: “Delay and dithering on the mayor’s feasibility study is frustrating, Londoners need the mayor to get on with making our tube network flush with new toilets.”

This story is published by Enfield Dispatch, Enfield's free monthly newspaper and free news website. We are a not-for-profit publication, published by a small social enterprise. We have no rich backers and rely on the support of our readers. Donate or become a supporter.

The study referred to by Russell was promised by Sadiq Khan in February, after Labour assembly members voted down a Green proposal to immediately create 70 new toilets across the transport network, at a cost of £20m.

Len Duvall, the assembly’s Labour group leader, had said the proposal “just seemed too vast” to commit to without first carrying out a feasibility study.

In May, TfL said it would share the terms of reference for the study by the end of June, but then said in August that it would be doing so “in the coming weeks”.

In response to Russell’s report, Mark Evers, TfL’s chief customer officer, said: “We recognise that toilet provision is absolutely essential for customer care and particularly so for older and disabled customers.

“We are working at pace on our study into improving toilets, and are committed to sharing this with our stakeholders and to working closely with them to gain a greater understanding of where we can improve facilities and identify suitable further opportunities for more toilets.”

A spokeswoman for Khan said the mayor “recognises the importance of free and accessible public toilets for Londoners” and that he will continue working with TfL to identify opportunities for more toilets.

‘Loo League Table’ of London lines:

1.) Elizabeth – 95% of stations have toilets (93% accessible)

2.) Metropolitan – 83% (29%)

3.) Jubilee – 63% (52%)

4.) Central – 59% (16%)

5.) Piccadilly – 55% (19%)

6.) Waterloo & City – 50% (50%)

7.) Victoria – 44% (25%)

8.) District – 42% (25%)

9.) Bakerloo – 32% (24%)

10.) Circle – 29% (23%)

11.) Overground – 28% (26%)

12.) Hammersmith & City – 28% (24%)

13.) Northern Line – 27% (21%)

14.) DLR – 11% (11%)

15.) Tram – 10% (8%)

We know times are hard

If you are struggling to make ends meet, we are keeping Enfield Dispatch free because of you. We know that many people cannot afford to pay for local news, so this website and our print paper will always be free. If you can afford to, and value what we do, a small monthly, yearly or one-off contribution can support us to keep providing quality journalism for Enfield to our community for free.

Monthly direct debit 

Annual direct debit

£5 per month supporters get a digital copy of each month’s paper before anyone else, £10 per month supporters get a digital copy of each month’s paper before anyone else and a print copy posted to them each month. £50 annual supporters get a digital copy of each month's paper before anyone else.  

Donate now with Pay Pal

More information on supporting us monthly or yearly 

More Information about donations